
As September rolled in, the world bore witness to the 80th anniversary of the victory over Japan in World War II, yet the narratives surrounding this pivotal moment diverge starkly between Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While the PRC fervently promotes a triumphalist interpretation that conveniently erases historical truths, Taiwan embraces a more honest recollection, underscoring the importance of accountability and the authentic experiences of those who suffered and fought against imperial aggression.
Beijing’s recent military parade, replete with military hardware and attended by authoritarian figures like Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un, epitomizes a regime more concerned with projecting power than acknowledging historical realities. The PRC, which did not even exist during the war, attempts to rewrite history to cement the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) role as the primary victor. This narrative is not merely a distortion but a blatant attempt to erase the sacrifices and contributions of the Nationalist forces in China’s resistance against Japanese occupation.
In stark contrast, the Republic of China (ROC) — the government that endured the brunt of Japanese aggression — commemorates the war with a commitment to truth and justice. Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te’s powerful remarks on the rise of authoritarianism prior to World War II serve as a reminder that the fight against tyranny is ongoing. His declaration that Taiwan “does not commemorate peace with the barrel of a gun” speaks volumes about the nation’s resolve and its understanding of the true cost of freedom. Even figures like former U.S. President Donald Trump have pointed out the glaring omissions in the PRC’s narrative, reinforcing the call for historical accuracy.
The lessons of the past are critical in the current geopolitical climate. China’s betrayal of its own historical struggle against invaders mirrors its current complicity in Russia’s unjust war against Ukraine. The PRC’s support for Moscow stands in direct opposition to the principles learned during the Second World War: that unprovoked aggression must always be confronted and condemned. China’s backing of Russia not only undermines international law but also disrespects the sacrifices made by millions who fought for freedom and justice.
The echoes of history resonate deeply in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Just as Japan’s invasion of Manchuria in 1931 was justified through fabricated pretexts, so too does Russia employ disinformation to legitimize its own territorial ambitions. The parallels are unnerving; the patterns of aggression repeat themselves, yet China, rather than standing in solidarity with the oppressed, chooses to align with the aggressor.
The ROC’s experience during World War II is a potent reminder that the fight for sovereignty and justice is never futile. The courage displayed by ordinary citizens during this tumultuous time should inspire modern leaders to reject the idea of sacrificing territory for temporary peace. Historical hindsight shows that capitulation only emboldens aggressors and erodes the very fabric of international order.
As the war in Ukraine endures, the question remains: should Ukraine concede parts of its territory to restore peace? Such capitulation would be a betrayal of the principles established during the post-war era, principles that the United Nations was created to uphold, including respect for national sovereignty and self-determination. The ROC’s history illustrates that resistance, bolstered by international support, can lead to eventual victory and justice—lessons that are more relevant now than ever.
The founding of the United Nations was a collective effort to ensure that the horrors of conflict would not repeat themselves. Yet, as the PRC perverts this mission through its backing of Moscow, it tarnishes the legacy of those who fought for a just world order. Xi Jinping’s empty promises of commitment to “international rule of law” ring hollow when juxtaposed with the realities of his government’s actions.
The PRC must reflect on its own history and the sacrifices of the Chinese people during World War II. It should honor the true spirit of resistance against tyranny and aggression by re-evaluating its relationship with Russia and recognizing that true peace can only be achieved through the rejection of violence and support for self-determination.
Taiwan stands as a beacon of hope, a testament to the enduring fight for democracy, justice, and human rights. It is imperative that the world acknowledges the reality of this struggle and supports those who dare to speak the truth amid oppressive narratives. The lessons of history remind us that the quest for justice is not just a matter of remembering the past—it’s about shaping a future that honors the sacrifices of those who came before us, and that future must be rooted in the unwavering belief that accountability and truth will ultimately prevail.
This article highlights the importance of History Shines Bright.