Heavy rains have unleashed catastrophic flooding and landslides in Nepal, revealing not only the country’s vulnerability to natural disasters but also the systemic failures that exacerbate these crises. In recent days, particularly affected areas include the eastern hilly district of Ilam, where dozens have lost their lives, and countless families have been displaced. The tragedy underscores the urgent need for a comprehensive reassessment of disaster preparedness and urban planning in the face of climate change.
The rainstorms, which began on October 3, have been described by experts as exceptionally intense, with localized downpours overwhelming certain districts while leaving others relatively unscathed. For instance, Rautahat and Ilam recorded over 330mm and 300mm of rain respectively, a staggering amount that far exceeds the threshold for what is considered extremely heavy rainfall. While this year’s total rainfall was marginally lower than last year’s catastrophic deluge that claimed more than 200 lives, the impact has been devastating due to the unprecedented nature of these localized weather events.
What triggered these floods? A potent combination of factors has been identified, including monsoon winds laden with moisture from the Bay of Bengal and the unique topography of the region. In districts like Rautahat, Bara, and Parsa, the flat Terai plains lack the elevation necessary to manage excessive water flow, leading to widespread flooding. In contrast, the steeper slopes of hilly areas like Ilam crumbled under the pressure, causing deadly landslides.
Moreover, the issue is compounded by poor infrastructure and unscientific development practices. Road expansions and encroachments on natural landscapes have destabilized essential ecosystems, making areas more susceptible to slides and floods. Experts have pointed out that the frequent landslides along the Narayangadh-Mugling highway are a direct result of inadequate planning and oversight. This is not merely an issue of inadequate responses to immediate disasters, but a systemic failure to integrate sustainable practices into infrastructure development.
Climate change looms large over these disasters, as increasing temperatures and erratic weather patterns contribute to more frequent and intense monsoon events. The recurrent nature of such extreme weather patterns should serve as a wake-up call for the government and policymakers. The science is clear: climate change is intensifying the hydrological cycle, creating a chaotic environment where disasters are not just possible, but inevitable.
In the midst of political turmoil, with protests against corruption and poor governance having erupted just weeks prior to these floods, the interim government led by Prime Minister Sushila Karki has received some commendations for its response. Early warnings were issued, road closures were implemented, and army personnel were deployed to assist those in need. However, despite these efforts, the scale of destruction reveals a deeper challenge: logistical hurdles remain significant, and the government’s response, while better than previous administrations, still falls short of what is necessary to truly safeguard citizens.
The stark contrast between the current government’s actions and those of former Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli during last year’s disaster could not be more pronounced. Oli’s absence during a national crisis drew ire, while Karki’s administration has taken swift action. Yet we must not let this praise obscure the larger truth: the government’s response must evolve beyond reactive measures to a proactive commitment to comprehensive disaster risk management.
Experts have outlined critical areas for improvement, including the need for sophisticated watershed management that prioritizes slope stabilization and runoff management. Failure to address these structural vulnerabilities sets the stage for repeating the same mistakes, leading to loss of life and property.
As we analyze the current situation, we see a gradual reduction in rainfall, but the damage has already been done. The echoes of 2024’s catastrophe linger, and communities remain strained under the weight of recovery efforts. The government must seize this moment to implement long-term strategies that address both immediate and systemic vulnerabilities.
The crisis also transcends borders, affecting neighboring India, where significant fatalities and destruction were reported in the city of Darjeeling. This regional interconnectedness highlights the need for cross-border collaboration in disaster preparedness and climate resilience initiatives.
In conclusion, the recent floods in Nepal serve as a grim reminder of the systemic inequities and infrastructural failures that render communities vulnerable to natural disasters. The government must adopt a holistic approach to disaster management, rooted in social justice and human rights, to ensure that no community is left behind in the face of climate change. This is not just a matter of political will; it is a moral imperative. The time to act is now, before the next storm strikes.
This article highlights the importance of EXPOSE SYSTEMIC FAILURES.
